Head to head · data verified August 2026

eToro vs IC Markets

A close call — 0.1 points apart. The winner depends on what you trade.

eToro
Beginners · Copy trading
8.6
IC Markets
Scalpers · High-volume forex traders
8.7

Pillar scores

eToroIC Markets
FeesIC Markets
7.89.3
PlatformsTie
8.99.0
Trust & regulationeToro
9.08.4
Market rangeeToro
8.78.2
SupportIC Markets
7.98.5

Side by side

CriterioneToroIC Markets
Overall score8.68.7
Founded20072007
RegulationFCA (UK), CySEC (EU), ASIC (AU)ASIC (AU), CySEC (EU), FSA (SC)
Min. deposit$50–$200 (varies by country)$200
Fees0% commission on real stocks; CFD spreads from ~1 pip EUR/USD; $5 withdrawal fee; 1% crypto feeRaw account: spreads from 0.0 pips + $3.50/lot; average EUR/USD spread ~0.1 pip
PlatformseToro web platform, eToro mobile appMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView
Markets5,000+ instruments: stocks, ETFs, crypto, forex, commodities, indices2,250+ instruments: forex, indices, commodities, bonds, crypto & stock CFDs
Demo accountYesYes
Best forBeginners, Copy trading, Long-term stock investorsScalpers, High-volume forex traders

Our verdict

Choose eToro if you want beginners · copy trading · long-term stock investors.

Choose IC Markets if you want scalpers · high-volume forex traders — its standout pillar in our scoring is fees.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. A majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, eToro or IC Markets?

It's close: eToro scores 8.6/10 and IC Markets 8.7/10 in our methodology. The right choice depends on your profile — eToro is strongest for beginners, while IC Markets leads for scalpers.

Is eToro safe?

eToro is overseen by FCA (UK), CySEC (EU), ASIC (AU). Our trust score for it is 9.0/10 — see the full eToro review for the reasoning.

Is IC Markets safe?

IC Markets is overseen by ASIC (AU), CySEC (EU), FSA (SC). Our trust score for it is 8.4/10 — see the full IC Markets review for the reasoning.